• Javed Mustafa
  • Muhammad Athar Hussain
  • Shafqat ullah
Keywords: Classroom Level Assessment, informal assessment, mathematics teaching, teacher training, assessment practices


Assessment is the essential part in the teaching learning process. The study explores the mathematics teachers’ assessment techniques at secondary level in the province of Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa, Pakistan. Survey research was conducted in which a five point Likert scale questionnaire was used for data collection from the target population. The questionnaire was validated through research experts and reliability coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.80. After validity and reliability of the questionnaire, 681 mathematics teachers were surveyed through multistage cluster sampling method. In these, 16 teachers were from urban areas and 465 were from rural areas. Findings of the study show that mathematics teachers did not use informal assessment techniques such as observation in the classroom. Projects, peer review and classroom presentation were also not in practice for the assessment of students in teaching of mathematics. Mostly mathematics teachers assessed their students through conventional teacher made test and review of homework. The lack of using multiple techniques in mathematics classroom is probably referred to insufficient training of teachers regarding use of various techniques for students’ assessment, overloaded classrooms and workload of teachers.

Author Biographies

Javed Mustafa
Assistant Professor, Department of Education and Research, Khushal Khan Khattak University, KPK, Pakistan.
Muhammad Athar Hussain
Assistant Professor, Department of Early Childhood Education and Elementary Teacher Education, Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad.
Shafqat ullah
PhD Scholar, Qurtaba University of Science & IT, Peshawar.


Babbie, E. (1990). Survey Research Methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Birenbaum, M., Breuer, K., Cascallar, E., Dochy, F., Dori, Y., Ridgway, J., Wiesemes, R., & Nickmans, G. (2006). A learning integrated assessment system. Educational research Review, 1(1), 61 – 67.

Retrieved from Black, P., & William, D. (2003). In praise of educational research: Formative assessment. British Educational Research Journal, (29)5, 623 – 637.

Brown, G. (2001). Assessment: A guide for lecturers. Learning and Teaching Support Network (LTSN), Assessment series No.3. New York: York Science Park.

Cohen L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). A guide to Teaching Practice. London: Routledge.

Colton, D., & Covert, R., W. (2007). Designing and constructing instruments for social research and evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

David, M. & Sutton, C. D. (2004). Social research: The basic. London: Sage Publications.

Dhiman, O. P. (2007). Foundations of Education. New Delhi: A.P.H. Publishing Corporation.

Florence, G., William, S. B., & Stenmark, J. K. (2003). Introduction. In Florence, Glanfield, William S. Bush, & Jean Kerr Stennark (Eds.) Mathematics assessment: A practical Handbook for Grade K-2. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Gliner, J. A., Morgan, G. A., & Leech, N. L. (2009). Research methods in applied settings: an integrated approach to design and analysis (2nd ed.). New York, London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Guskey, T.R. (2003). How classroom assessments improve learning? Educational leadership, (60)5, 6-11.

Lambert, D. & Lines, D. (2000). Understanding Assessment. London: Routledge Flamer.

Leder, G. C., Brew, C., & Rowley, G. (1999). Gender differences in mathematics achievement – Here today and gone tomorrow? In Kaiser G., Luna E. and Huntely I. (eds.), International comparisons in mathematics education (pp. 213 – 224). London: Falmer Press, London.

Maki, P. L. (2002). Developing an assessment plan to learn about student learning. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(1-2), 8 - 13.

McMillan, J. H. & Suzanne, N. (2000). Teacher classroom assessment and grading practices decision making.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA.

McMillan, J. H., Steve, M., & Workman, D. (2002). Elementary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(4), 203 – 213.

Mertens, D. M. (2005). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA; Sage Publications.

Moreland, J. & Jones, A. (2000). Emerging assessment practices in an emergent curriculum: Implications for technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(3), 283 – 305.

Morgan, C. (1996). Teacher as examiner: The case of mathematics coursework. Assessment in Education, 3(3), 353 –375.

Morgan, C. & Watson, A. (2002). The Interpretive nature of teachers’ assessment of students’ mathematics: Issues for equity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(2), 78 –110.

OFSTED (Office for Standards in Education). (2003). Good Assessment in Secondary schools. London: OFSTED.

Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., & Willson, V. (2011). Measurement and Assessment in Education (2nd Eds). New Delhi: PHI Learning.

Rodriguez, M. C. (2004). The role of classroom assessment in student performance on TIMSS. Applied measurement in education, 17 ( 1), 1–24.

Ronis, D. (2007). Brain compatible mathematics. California: Sage Publication.

Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappa, 38(10), 758–765.

Retrieved from http://www.pdkintl. org/kappan/k0206sti.htm.

Watt, H. M. G. (2005). Attitudes to the use of alternative assessment methods in mathematics: A study with secondary mathematics teachers in Sydney, Australia. Educational studies in mathematics, 58 (1), 21– 44.